--- description: Get detailed information about Jenkins usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra Israel. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Jenkins Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra Israel 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Continuous Integration Software](/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) > [Jenkins](/software/171026/jenkins) # Jenkins Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.il/software/171026/jenkins Page: 1 / 24\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/171026/jenkins?page=2) > On-premise and web-based continuous integration solution that provides businesses with tools to build, test and deploy projects. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 573 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Jenkins? On-premise and web-based continuous integration platform that provides businesses of all sizes with plugins to build, test and deploy projects across networks. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 573 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: CloudBees - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) - **Pricing Details**: Jenkins is available to users for free. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: Chinese, English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - Automated Testing - Continuous Delivery - Continuous Deployment - Debugging - Pipeline Management - Version Control ## Integrations (9 total) - Acunetix - Bitbucket - Gatekeeper - GitHub - GitLab - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Slack - SonarQube ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support ## Category - [Continuous Integration Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Alternatives 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6198 reviews) 2. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1347 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1224 reviews) 4. [AWS CloudFormation](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/205397/cloudformation) — 4.5/5 (111 reviews) 5. [SonarQube](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/210481/sonarqube) — 4.5/5 (68 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Using Jenkins in managing CI/CD process" — 5.0/5 > **Jim** | *28 November 2025* | Telecommunications | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Jenkins is super powerful and ease to use in CI/CD, it can integrate all critical phases in checking out, building, testing and delivery. > > **Cons**: The plugin management is still complicated and required lots of rebooting, for example. If I forgot to install git plugin, I will need to reinstall it and reboot the whole Jenkins. > > I already used Jenkins since 2012, it is my first priority in CI/CD, it can be easily used in personal projects in container, as well as big corporate level IT projects. ----- ### "The Industry Standard for Flexible, Enterprise-Grade CI/CD Pipelines" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *23 January 2026* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The strongest feature is the Master-Slave architecture, which allows us to distribute heavy build workloads across multiple agents efficiently. I also rely heavily on Jenkins Pipelines (Jenkinsfile) to define our entire build-and-deploy process as code, which supports our agile development cycle perfectly. The sheer number of plugins available means I can integrate it with almost anything in our stack, from Docker and Kubernetes to SonarQube and Artifactory. > > **Cons**: The user interface (UI) feels a bit dated compared to newer tools like GitLab CI or CircleCI. Also, managing plugins can sometimes be a headache, specifically 'dependency hell' where updating one plugin breaks another. It requires careful maintenance to keep the controller stable. > > I have used Jenkins extensively to orchestrate end-to-end CI/CD infrastructure for highly secure government and financial environments. It serves as the backbone of our automation, handling everything from code checkout (Git/Bitbucket) to Docker image creation and deployment to Kubernetes clusters. While it requires some maintenance effort, its flexibility and control are unmatched for complex, custom enterprise workflows. ----- ### "A Solid Engineering Workflow Tool That Helps Product Teams" — 5.0/5 > **Braden** | *11 August 2026* | Design | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: I liked that Jenkins gives product and engineering teams a clear connection between design changes, development, testing, and release. Once the workflow is established, it helps reduce the uncertainty around whether a feature is actually ready to move forward. The automation also means designers don’t have to constantly chase updates from engineering. > > **Cons**: The interface is probably the weakest part for me. It feels very developer-oriented and can be intimidating if you are coming from a design or product background. Understanding pipelines and configuration also takes some time before it becomes intuitive. > > My experience with Jenkins has been positive, particularly when working closely with engineering teams. It isn't a tool I use to create designs, but it gives me better visibility into how work moves from implementation through testing and release. I found it especially useful on larger projects where several teams needed a consistent process and fewer manual handoffs. ----- ### "Functional but becomes way too complex" — 3.0/5 > **Edgar** | *22 December 2024* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **Pros**: The software itself is stable, it runs well and is not too complex to install > > **Cons**: The fact that pipelines are built either with a UI which makes the pipeline tough to read when you have lots of conditions. The groovy language can also be used to write pipelines, but really ?? Let’s use a more common scripting language for this, maybe Python or ruby. ----- ### "Reliable and Flexible CI/CD Solutio" — 5.0/5 > **Arti** | *6 May 2026* | Accounting Software | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: As a Jenkins user, I like how flexible it is and how many plugins are available to fit different needs. It integrates well with our tools and helps automate builds and deployments efficiently. Once everything is set up, it saves a lot of time and makes our workflow smoother. > > **Cons**: I find it can be difficult to set up and maintain, especially with many plugins. The UI feels outdated and not very intuitive. Managing pipelines and troubleshooting failures can take time, and plugin compatibility issues sometimes cause instability. > > Overall experience has been positive. It’s powerful, flexible, and supports extensive automation with a wide range of plugins. While setup and maintenance can be tricky and the UI feels a bit outdated, it significantly improves our CI/CD workflows once configured. Despite occasional plugin issues, it’s a reliable tool that saves time and boosts productivity for our development team. ----- Page: 1 / 24\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/171026/jenkins?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/171026/jenkins) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data