--- description: Get detailed information about Ideagen EHS usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra Israel. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Ideagen EHS Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra Israel 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Energy Management Software](/directory/20018/energy-management/software) > [Ideagen EHS](/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS) # Ideagen EHS Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.il/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS Page: 1 / 4\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS?page=2) > AI-powered EHS solution for highly regulated sectors, delivering real-time risk insights and compliance automation. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 67 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Ideagen EHS? Aerospace, Agriculture, Automotive, Chemicals, Construction \& Building Materials, Corporate Services, Energy \& Environmental, Life Sciences, Manufacturing, Transportation/Logistics, Telecommunication ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.4/5** | 67 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Ideagen - **Founded**: 1993 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop), Android (Mobile), iPhone (Mobile), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: Brazilian Portuguese, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Icelandic, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Malay, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish, Vietnamese - **Available Countries**: Australia, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Activity Dashboard - Air Emissions Management - Alerts/Notifications - Archiving & Retention - Audit Management - Audit Planning - Carbon Emissions Calculations - Change Management Software - Collaboration Tools - Complaint Management Software - Compliance Management - Compliance Tracking - Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPA) - Customizable Reports - Customizable Templates - Dashboard Software - Data Visualization Software - Document Capture - Document Classification - Document Coding & Control - Document Storage - Electronic Signature - Emission Reduction Planning - Emissions Monitoring - Equipment Management - File Conversion - File Sharing Software - Forms Management - Greenhouse Gas Tracking - Hazardous Materials Management - Incident Management Software - Incident Reporting - Inspection Management - Maintenance Management Software - Monitoring - OSHA Recordkeeping - On Call Scheduling - Response Management - Risk Analysis - Risk Assessment - Risk Scoring - Search/Filter - Status Tracking - Sustainability Management - Third-Party Integrations - Version Control - Waste Management Software - Water Management - Workflow Management Software ... and 12 more features ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Energy Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/20018/energy-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Energy Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/20018/energy-management/software) - [Emissions Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30554/emissions-management/software) - [Environmental Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30662/environmental/software) - [Risk Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30665/risk-management/software) - [EHS Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/10015/ehs-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Scrut Automation](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1052809/scrut) — 4.9/5 (139 reviews) 2. [Connecteam](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5203 reviews) 3. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (534 reviews) 4. [SafetyCulture](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/141080/iauditor) — 4.6/5 (353 reviews) 5. [SiteDocs](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/143579/sitedocs) — 4.8/5 (255 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Good value for money." — 5.0/5 > **Marcia** | *22 January 2025* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Intuitive, simple to use and cost effective > > **Cons**: There isn't much that I don't like, Though the risk management module is not intuitive and doesnt flow the way traditional static organisations would use it. It appears to be more focussed on a transitional environment such as construction or project based activities. Also I would suggest a review of the workflow for managing incidents could be better. > > I have nothing but good things to say about Ideagen Lucidity. From their Customer service, which is friendly and efficient, to the system itself. ----- ### "Functional Limitations, Poor Governance, and Administrative Inefficiencies" — 2.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *23 April 2026* | Construction Software | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Pros**: The platform offers reasonable value for money compared to other products on the market. It is generally user-friendly for end users, with a relatively intuitive interface for day-to-day use. However, this ease of use does not extend to set-up and administration, which are more complex and less intuitive. From a governance perspective, document control is weak, and the overall structure of the platform appears poorly planned and organised. This creates challenges in maintaining consistency, traceability, and confidence in the integrity of records over time. > > **Cons**: We predominantly rely on the InForm and Incident modules, as limitations in the other modules reduce their practicality and tend to complicate, rather than support, our processes. My experience with the InForm and Incident modules has been consistently frustrating. A key issue is the inability to properly preview forms that include conditional logic. Conditional fields do not display in preview mode, meaning administrators are forced to publish forms to validate them. This is not just inconvenient, it introduces real risk, as errors are only identified once the form is live. The suggested workaround of creating new versions to test changes is not practical in a controlled environment, as it disrupts internal reporting, impacts data continuity, and complicates the investigation of historical records. In addition, basic configuration tasks such as bulk editing fields, rearranging table columns, or converting field types require unnecessary rework, making the build process inefficient and time-consuming. The platform also falls short in terms of usability and flexibility when managing more complex forms. There is limited control over layout and structure, such as the inability to easily rearrange sections, minimise them, or apply conditional logic at a section level. Simple improvements, like consistent default radio button configurations or clearer visual distinction between sections, are missing. Administrative inefficiencies are further compounded by poor duplication behaviour, lack of formatting options, and rigid field settings. These issues collectively make it difficult to build structured, user-friendly forms at scale, and increase the likelihood of inconsistencies across projects. From a governance and systems perspective, the most significant concern is the lack of robust document control. There is no visibility over revision history, including who made changes, when they were made, or what was updated. There is also no ability to undo changes. This creates a major gap in traceability and accountability, particularly in environments where compliance and auditability are critical. Broader system issues, such as glitches between mobile and web submissions, poor integration between actions and parent records, limitations in role configuration, and inefficient file upload processes, further reduce confidence in the platform. While it may appear cost-effective at face value, the operational inefficiencies, compliance risks, and administrative burden significantly outweigh any initial savings. > > Not positive. They do not take feedback onboard or feature requests. They have no clear road-map of what is being worked on. In the past two years they have allocated time (and money) to introducing 2 new versions both of which were face-lifts only. ----- ### "Safety safety safety.. Incident reports made easy\!" — 5.0/5 > **Renee** | *13 December 2024* | Building Materials | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: After utilizing this software multiple times while on-site today, I wanted to leave a review. Consumers tend to leave reviews when a product dissapoints them \& EHS has done nothing but impress me, the more that I utilize it\! The dashboard is what's truly sold me on this software\! It's updated in real time, so there's no waiting around for a list or an email to provide to our safety team about things that need addressed. Nobody has to run around trying to find someone or get the information relayed second hand. > > **Cons**: I had to figure out how to re-size my photos because I sometimes get an error stating the file is too large. (When uploading to a report) Pictures of the injury or areas of concern such as a safety concern are important so luckily it was a simple fix to get my phone to take photos that aren't huge. > > Our business is one of the most dangerous ones in the industry. We make windows \& doors \& as you can imagine, that involves a lot of broken glass which can cause serious injuries. We've finally found the software that works across the board for everyone from the hourly worker to the project managers. EHS is faster, easier \& much more efficient for documenting incidents than the other software we've implemented in the past. They thought of all the important questions to ask in order to collect the critical details to reduce the risk of future accidents from occurring. This software utilizes an exact footprint of our building so employees are able to document exactly where the incident occurred. The best part of this software is that if someone recognizes something that could potentially be an issue in the future, they can simply report it in EHS, without the hassle of trying to track down someone from maintenance or the safety team . We are provided with immediate updates of what we call "hotspots," so they can be addressed right away. We have found that with this software, employees are recording a lot more non-injury incidents than they have in the past. The feedback we've received from our employees about switching to EHS has overall been positive. There's an option to report a non-injury incident, which was not available with our previous software. Our safety team wants every bit of information they can get in order to properly implement risk management \& this software makes that happen. Our company has already seen a decline in incidents by making the necessary changes to prevent them ahead of time. EHS hasn't missed a thing \& I don't imagine we'll be changing to a different program ever again. ----- ### "Disappointed" — 1.0/5 > **Peter** | *2 March 2025* | Construction Software | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Pros**: Didn't get opportunity to utilise software. > > **Cons**: Poor Customer Service. Onboarding Software. > > Our experience with Lucidity Software has been extremely disappointing. After engaging with their team, we were left frustrated by poor communication, a lack of accountability, and zero interest in customer feedback. Despite multiple attempts to resolve our concerns, our requests were continuously passed between different team members, each providing the same dismissive response while hiding behind contractual terms. At no point did anyone take the time to genuinely understand what went wrong or show any willingness to improve their process. What’s most frustrating is that their sales team made commitments that were not honoured, leaving us with unusable software and no resolution. Rather than engaging in meaningful dialogue, Lucidity simply deflected responsibility, making it clear they value contracts over customer satisfaction. I strongly advise others to be cautious before committing to this platform, as our experience has shown a complete lack of support and accountability from Lucidity costing our company $25K with no beneficial return. ----- ### "Great System for tracking, but room for improvement" — 4.0/5 > **Zachary** | *15 April 2025* | Mechanical or Industrial Engineering | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The ability to track a mass amount of data. Currently at my company we use it to add, evaluate and track leading and lagging indicators > > **Cons**: There have been times when the program seems to lag, there also seems like the usability could be more friendly, it is easy to get lost in the weeds > > I enjoy it, and believe it to be a beneficial Safety Management System. With some improvement it could be one of the best systems. I have used KPA, and Velocity as well. ----- Page: 1 / 4\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/150019/Ideagen-EHS) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | ----- ## Structured Data