--- description: Get detailed information about Responsive, formerly RFPIO usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra Israel. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Responsive, formerly RFPIO Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra Israel 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Proposal Management Software](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](/software/148054/Responsive) # Responsive, formerly RFPIO Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.il/software/148054/Responsive Page: 1 / 9\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) > Cloud-based response management tool for handling RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires via AI drafting, a content library, and team. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 190 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Responsive, formerly RFPIO? Small businesses to Fortune 500 enterprises across technology, financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 190 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Responsive - **Location**: Beaverton, US - **Founded**: 2015 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Usage Based - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: Arabic, Chinese, Danish, English, French, German, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish - **Available Countries**: Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Israel, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sweden and 3 more ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Audit Trail - Automatic Formatting - Collaboration Tools - Content Library - Content Management System (CMS) Software - Data Import/Export - Document Management Software - Due Date Tracking - Full Text Search - Knowledge Base Management - Knowledge Library - Milestone Tracking - Progress Tracking - Project Planning/Scheduling - Proposal Generation - RFP Management - Reporting & Statistics - Reporting/Analytics - Reporting/Project Tracking - Search/Filter - Task Management Software - Templates - Third-Party Integrations - Time & Expense Tracking - Vendor Management Software - Version Control - Workflow Management Software ## Integrations (8 total) - Agentforce - Dynamics 365 Sales - HubSpot Sales Hub - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Word - Okta - RushInCloud - Salesforce Platform ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [RFP Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/31555/rfp/software) - [Sourcing Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30932/sourcing/software) - [Document Generation Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/31576/document-generation/software) - [Workflow Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Breeze](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1073046/Breeze) — 5.0/5 (15 reviews) 2. [XaitPorter](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/76385/xaitporter) — 4.7/5 (50 reviews) 3. [Axonaut](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/178036/axonaut) — 4.5/5 (23 reviews) 4. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1260 reviews) 5. [VT Docs](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/117155/visiblethread-docs) — 4.9/5 (52 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Nobody wants to answer RFPs, Responsive makes it easier" — 4.0/5 > **Hector** | *27 March 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: No one wants to answer RFPs; it is an outdated industry practice. Responsive makes this easier by providing a central repository for all RFP responses and enabling collaboration among team members, which improves productivity by allowing people from different teams to work on proposals in parallel. > > **Cons**: The AI capabilities are still immature, and the generated answers always need to be reviewed, which is time-consuming and undermines the solution's productivity gains. > > I think the solution has many areas for improvement, particularly in AI and library maintenance, but the core functionality is solid and delivers the key features needed by growing organizations. ----- ### "Best Solution in the Industry to Me" — 5.0/5 > **Susan** | *16 April 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The speed in which I can import projects. The export to original upload format. The AI, the AI\!\!\!\!\! The wonderful responsive, accurate, helpful support team. The incredible staff, webinars, coffee chats, and community > > **Cons**: When I find the hidden incapabiilties, contact the help team, and then realize that it is fact an incapability. For example, we can run one AI Draft per project; otherwise a staff member has to clone it to add an additional document. > > I lovvvve Responsive\! There is zero comparison to the tool I had previously that literally kept me working through the night\! ----- ### "Responsive Review" — 3.0/5 > **Hannah** | *24 March 2026* | Pharmaceuticals | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: It automates responses, and aids in seeing past responses. Helps track the progress of bids and sets reminders to meet deadlines. > > **Cons**: The answers don't always pull in accurately for questions we have seen over and over again. Navigating questions can be difficult, or going back to finding an unanswered question is not straightforward. > > Ok. Has some features that simplifies the RFP process, while other navigation features make it harder. ----- ### "An extremely powerful content management system for RFPs and Sales content." — 4.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *3 November 2025* | Education Management | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The rich feature set and flexibility around managing content is excellent. While it's a little intimidating at first, the amount of functionality is one of Responsive's strong points. > > **Cons**: Occasionally there's bugs and glitches. I think the downside of having so many features and functionality is the risk that code clashes sometimes and bugs are present. Responsive is very errr...responsive with bugs and addressing support tickets which is a plus, however, it would be good if bugs weren't present in the first place of course. > > It's been a great experience. A huge step up from our previous platform. The power of the platform is a clear win...the flexibility and options to manage and review content is second to none. Once familiar with the platform, it offers amazing flexibility to a power user. ----- ### "Director, Proposals" — 5.0/5 > **Nick** | *16 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Progress tracking is one at the top of the list. The amount of hours it saves our proposal managers on tracking the progress of a project is massive. That lone is worth the value. In addition, the accountability it holds with associates in reviewing their content. Without a system like Responsive's content library and review structure, our responses would not be where they are at today. Lastly, employee management - I oversee the proposal team and each morning I review a status on all projects to see where we are and having a dashboard like the Project view, executive dashboards, etc. it's extremely helpful. > > **Cons**: Exporting into templates. My team spends a considerable amount of extra hours cleaning up the formatting when it doesn't export well or when we export into our template, but want to align with the clients RFP format - most times, it doesn't export that way, so the proposal managers spend countless hours cleaning this up. I have addressed this in the past. I would love it if there was a way we could have some sort of sequential author answering in the project. Today, we have multiple people that could contribute to one response. When one person is done, there is no way to track their progress, so what we have to do is create a manual process for tracking. It's extremely time consuming. > > I love Responsive. It's a great tool and best on the market. We couldn't do our job the same way without it. ----- Page: 1 / 9\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/148054/Responsive) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data