--- description: Get detailed information about AwardScience usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra Israel. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: AwardScience Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra Israel 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Grant Management Software](/directory/30567/grant-management/software) > [AwardScience](/software/1085808/awardscience) # AwardScience Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1085808/awardscience Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1085808/awardscience?page=2) > AwardScience manages awards, grants, and scholarships end-to-end, with AI scoring, no-code workflows, and multi-channel comms built in. > > Verdict: Rated **5.0/5** by 12 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses AwardScience? AwardScience fits any organization that runs a formal award, grant, or scholarship program, from corporate foundations and government agencies to universities, accelerators, and incubators. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **5.0/5** | 12 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: KY & Company ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$149.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: It is billed annually; the price shown is the monthly cost. - **Target Audience**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: Brazilian Portuguese, Chinese, English, French, German, Spanish, Traditional Chinese - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 209 more ## Features - Applicant Tracking Software - Application Management - Collaboration Tools - Customizable Forms - Document Review - Email Reminders - Financial Reporting Software - Forms Management - Grant Management Software - Payment Tracking - Ratings/Reviews - Reminders - Reporting & Statistics - Reviewer Management - Scoring - Status Tracking ## Integrations (4 total) - Azure Active Directory External Identities - SAP BW/4HANA - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Zapier ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Grant Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Grant Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30567/grant-management/software) - [Scholarship Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30809/scholarship-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Good Grants](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/206672/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Instrumentl](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1015875/instrumentl) — 5.0/5 (192 reviews) 3. [Submittable](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/158382/submittable) — 4.8/5 (399 reviews) 4. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (96 reviews) 5. [RQ Platform](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/216443/rq-awards) — 4.7/5 (41 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Clear stages and scores, but missing menus go unexplained." — 5.0/5 > **Chit Hei** | *30 September 2026* | Staffing & Recruiting | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like best is how the screens match the work I do each week. The tabs split things cleanly — applications and to-dos in one place, Studio for building the programme, then admin and reports — so I open the right section instead of searching a long menu. On the site map, pages sit in the same order applicants see, and I drag a flow onto the page it belongs to. The short “How this page works” tour, together with the help guide, got me through the first setup on my own. Building a form is dragging fields into reading order, and the flow canvas works the same way for stages: I connect one step to the next, and each application is routed from there. The part I did not expect to rely on is preview. I check the form as an applicant would before it goes live, which has cut down the “which box do I fill in?” emails. > > **Cons**: The side menu only lists the sections your account is allowed to open. When one you expect is missing, nothing explains why — the item is simply not there, so it is easy to think you are in the wrong place. A short note such as "you don't have access to this" would make that clear straight away. > > AwardScience has been a clear way to run our award. Applications come in through one form, move through the stages we set up, and reach the reviewers assigned to them. Scores and comments stay on the entry, so we can see where everything stands and explain a decision afterwards. The screens are easy to work in. The menu is split by task, short tours and the help guide covered the first setup, and building a form or a stage is mostly dragging things into place. While scoring, a suggested mark and a short reason gave me a comment to edit instead of a blank box. The one annoyance is the side menu. It only shows the sections an account can open, and a missing item comes with no explanation, so it can look as if you are in the wrong place. ----- ### "A modern and surprisingly smooth awards management platform" — 5.0/5 > **Sam** | *28 April 2026* | Education Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: We used Nobel to manage our awards program, and it made the whole process much easier to control\! Setting up submissions, assigning reviewers, tracking judging progress, and checking results were all straightforward. The platform felt clean, organized, and easy for both admins and applicants to use, which saved us a lot of manual follow-up. > > **Cons**: Some of the more advanced settings may take a little time to configure properly at the beginning, especially if the awards program has several stages or different judging rules. Once everything is set up, though, the platform is easy to manage. > > Nobel was easy to use, well-structured, and reliable throughout the awards process. It helped our team run submissions and judging more efficiently, while keeping the experience simple for both admins and applicants. ----- ### "Powerful and flexible platform for award and grant management" — 5.0/5 > **Sohan Gupta** | *26 June 2026* | Nonprofit Organization Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Nobel makes the full award and grant process much easier to manage from start to finish. The visual workflow builder and no code form builder give teams a lot of flexibility, while features like conditional branching, deadline scheduling, automated reminders, and analytics dashboards help reduce manual work and improve oversight. I also like that the platform supports team collaboration well, with reusable records, team applications, granular permissions, and clear dashboards for applicants, judges, and program managers. The AI features are especially impressive and genuinely useful. AI assisted scoring with written reasoning helps reviewers move faster while still keeping decisions transparent and structured. Features like Ask AI, AI insights, similarity detection, professional matching, and document extraction add real value because they reduce manual effort, surface useful patterns, and help teams make better decisions more efficiently. Instead of feeling like extras, the AI tools feel meaningfully integrated into the platform. > > **Cons**: Teams that only need a very simple application process may not use the full depth of tools such as branching logic, advanced permissions, and analytics. > > My overall experience with Nobel has been very positive. It stands out as a strong platform for organizations running awards, grants, and multi stage review programs because it combines ease of use with advanced functionality for data management, collaboration, and process automation. It is particularly valuable for teams that want one system for applications, judging, reporting, communication, and tracking funding opportunities without relying on multiple separate tools. ----- ### "Review for nobel" — 5.0/5 > **Michael** | *9 April 2026* | Pharmaceuticals | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The UX is clearly designed with the human element in mind. It’s "frustration-free" software; navigation is logical, and the dashboard provides a high-level overview that makes complex data easy to digest at a glance. > > **Cons**: Honestly, there is very little to complain about. If I had to nitpick, the initial configuration of complex multi-stage workflows has a slight learning curve because the system is so robust. However, the support team walked us through it, so it was never a true blocker. > > Our experience with Nobel has been transformative. Before migrating, our grant process was a fragmented mess of spreadsheets and manual emails. Nobel centralized everything into a sleek, automated pipeline. It hasn't just saved us time; it has elevated the professionalism of our entire organization in the eyes of applicants. ----- ### "Game-changing AI tools and a visual workflow builder that saves our team endless hours" — 5.0/5 > **Ryle** | *4 August 2026* | Civic & Social Organization | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The node-based visual workflow builder and AI professional matching features are phenomenal. Being able to physically map out application pathways, conditional branching, and automated email/WhatsApp triggers on a visual canvas gives us total clarity before launching. The AI assistant also helps suggest and score expert reviewers based on specific domain expertise, taking the guesswork out of panel assembly. > > **Cons**: Because the visual builder offers so much granular control over conditions and actions, it requires a short testing phase to ensure your logic flows match your exact desired execution before going live. > > AwardScience feels like a generation ahead of traditional awards platforms. Combining automated multi-channel messaging (both email and WhatsApp) with intelligent reviewer matching has eliminated operational friction. It empowers our small team to manage complex, modern recognition programs with zero developer intervention. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1085808/awardscience?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1085808/awardscience) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | ----- ## Structured Data