--- description: Get detailed information about RevenueCat usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra Israel. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: RevenueCat Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra Israel 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Subscription Management Software](/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) > [RevenueCat](/software/212540/revenuecat) # RevenueCat Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.il/software/212540/revenuecat Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/212540/revenuecat?page=2) > RevenueCat provides backend subscription infrastructure and analytics for mobile and web apps. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 47 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses RevenueCat? Mobile app developers, subscription-based SaaS companies, and ecommerce brands. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.7/5** | 47 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: RevenueCat ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Usage Based (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Free: Free, up to $10k in monthly tracked revenue Starter: 0.08% of monthly tracked revenue Pro: 1.2% of monthly tracked revenue Enterprise: Contact Us \*MTR = Monthly Tracked Revenue - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Cancellation Management - Discount Management - Enrollments/Onboarding - Multi-Period Recurring Billing - Multiple Payment Options - Product Catalog - Recurring/Subscription Billing - Revenue Recognition Software - Self Service Portal - Subscription Management Software - Subscription Plan Management - Third-Party Integrations - Usage Tracking/Analytics ## Integrations (16 total) - Adjust - Amazon S3 - Amplitude - AppsFlyer - Branch - CleverTap - Google Cloud - Intercom - Mixpanel - OneSignal - Segment - Slack - SplitMetrics Acquire - Stripe - Tenjin ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software - Chat ## Category - [Subscription Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Subscription Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/31657/subscription-management/software) - [Publishing and Subscriptions Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/20020/publishing-and-subscriptions/software) - [Recurring Billing Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30927/recurring-billing/software) - [SaaS Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/31639/saas-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Subbly](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/144363/subbly) — 4.8/5 (216 reviews) 2. [Stripe Billing](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/178774/stripe-billing) — 4.7/5 (203 reviews) 3. [Zenskar](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1063217/zenskar) — 5.0/5 (54 reviews) 4. [Chargebee](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/131433/chargebee) — 4.2/5 (104 reviews) 5. [PayRequest](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/198184/payrequest) — 4.8/5 (101 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Great idea, terrible execution and terrible support" — 1.0/5 > **Robert** | *12 January 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like the idea of it, and the fact that it could consolidate.your monetisation strategy. (When it works correctly) > > **Cons**: The support is terrible, the documentation is terrible. > > It takes a lot for me to leave a bad review. RevenueCat is a great idea, but poorly executed. The documentation is scatty, their API is inconsistent, there has been 2 sets of downtime since I signed up and the level of support from RevenueCat is absolutely unacceptable. For a company that takes a 1% cut of your revenue forever—potentially up to thousands of dollars per month—this is beyond ridiculous. 5-10 business days for an email response? If I’m lucky, maybe 2-3 days. Their documentation is a joke, basically saying to try the obvious and failing that “Go ask someone else on the forums” And their forums? Just a graveyard of unanswered posts with people begging for updates. I’ve been stuck trying to fix Android issues for over a week. I’m confident my setup is correct, but still, nothing works. Getting any kind of timely help from RevenueCat is like pulling teeth. I even wasted time in one of their Q\&A sessions on the recommendation of their support team, which was nothing more than a shameless product pitch. Their exact words: “We aren’t answering implementation questions today.” despite half of the people on the session voting for implementation help. It’s clear to me that RevenueCat doesn’t prioritise supporting their customers. Their strategy is obvious—sign up as many people as possible, then leave them hanging. When our success is literally their success, how can they justify this level of neglect? It’s infuriating. ----- ### "Best service for in-app purchases" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *23 January 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The simplicity to setup in-app purchases for mobile apps and the pricing > > **Cons**: Really I don't know what to say here. Maybe the cheaper plan could have a bit more features? > > Really happy with it, I like their documentations and the ease of use ----- ### "Using RevenueCat server from app inception to release to the App Store" — 5.0/5 > **Sudipto** | *16 July 2021* | Leisure, Travel & Tourism | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The integration mechanism into swift code base is detailed in RevenueCat docs. This made it possible to successfully integrate it. It is very helpful that testing in the sandbox is possible using a sandbox user > > **Cons**: The concepts of Entitlements, Offerings, Products is difficult to memorize. It's good that RevenueCat has readily available detailed documentation to cover these concepts > > The integration is stable. Once coded, I seldom need to revisit it. So, it's now a seamless experience for my users and the app ----- ### "Simple Solution for In-App Subscriptions" — 5.0/5 > **Dakota** | *20 January 2022* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: RevenueCat made it really easy for us to implement In-App Subscriptions for our app with absolutely no prior experience in taking payments on mobile devices. It saved us the upfront cost of paying for our own server to verify purchases along with the potential months of headache to handle all of the different scenarios you need to plan for and handle with in-app purchases (buying, renewing, pausing, canceling, etc.) Being able to pull information directly from RevenueCat instead of hard-coding it into our app also meant we could have a single source of truth (the App Store/Google Play Store) where we would update our available products. > > **Cons**: The only thing I wasn't a fan of (which has since been changed) was the payment model. When we first integrated it, the payment model was a fixed monthly rate versus the percentage cut that it is now. Extremely useful features like webhooks weren't accessible for us at the time because of this, but as I stated they've now changed this. Because of that, I cannot name anything I dislike about RevenueCat. > > We turned to RevenueCat because of the hassle that exists trying to verify purchases manually. Doing this ourselves would mean setting up a server, handling all the different cases across the App Store and Play Store, and making sure this server is maintained and always live. For a small team like ours, this just wasn't viable and any potential money "saved" doing it ourselves would be lost in the time we would spend setting up our own solution. That would also mean extra time before an app can be released which would increase our time to market. RevenueCat handled everything we needed it to and took about a week to fully integrate. ----- ### "I Need RevenueCat" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *15 December 2020* | E-Learning | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I have to chose 1 thing? I can't. 1. I love how you built this for hardworking app developers. You saw the unmet need and you filled it with love. 2. I love your response from your team when I have a question or problem. 3. I love how you offer a very affordable service and when we want more features you hook us so we have to pay more but we like it ;) > > **Cons**: Better communication with Apple when we update our price of subscription. Have that reflect on our charts side. > > Over all I am 100% happy. I can continue to be happy when you keep iterating as we all must in the subscription world. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/212540/revenuecat?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/212540/revenuecat) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data