--- description: Get detailed information about HackerOne usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra Israel. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerOne Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra Israel 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Penetration Testing](/directory/34498/penetration-testing-software/software) > [HackerOne](/software/165190/hackerone) # HackerOne Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.il/software/165190/hackerone Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/165190/hackerone?page=2) > HackerOne is the industry standard for hacker-powered security. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 12 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 12 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: HackerOne ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Per Feature - **Pricing Details**: Contact HackerOne directly for pricing information - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Android (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - API - Activity Dashboard - Alerts/Notifications - Compliance Management - Incident Management Software - Network Scanning - Policy Management Software - Prioritization - Reporting/Analytics - SQL Injections - Simulated Threat Attacks - Threat Intelligence Software - Vulnerability Assessment - Vulnerability Protection - Vulnerability Scanning - Vulnerability/Threat Prioritization - Web-Application Security ## Integrations (23 total) - AppSec Education Platform - Assembla - Bitium - Cisco Duo - Freshdesk - GitHub - GitLab - Jira - JumpCloud Directory Platform - JupiterOne - MantisBT - Microsoft Teams - OTRS - Okta - OneLogin ... and 8 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base Software ## Category - [Penetration Testing](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/34498/penetration-testing-software/software) ## Related Categories - [Penetration Testing](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/34498/penetration-testing-software/software) - [Vulnerability Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/31062/vulnerability-management/software) - [Vulnerability Scanner Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/32775/vulnerability-scanner/software) - [Cybersecurity Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/31037/cybersecurity/software) - [Network Security Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30003/network-security/software) ## Alternatives 1. [ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/185510/manageengine-vulnerability-manager-plus) — 4.6/5 (32 reviews) 2. [Action1](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/180609/action1-rmm) — 4.9/5 (237 reviews) 3. [Orca Security](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/188445/orca-security) — 4.8/5 (60 reviews) 4. [Phoenix Security](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1030001/appsec-phoenix) — 4.7/5 (74 reviews) 5. [baramundi Management Suite](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/177946/baramundi-management-suite) — 4.6/5 (140 reviews) ## Reviews ### "HackerOne Saves Me From Product Disasters" — 4.0/5 > **Wes** | *4 December 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: It's user interface is very intuitive. Has a large community of seasoned security reviewers. Generates clear reporters making bug tracking and collaboration quite easy. Great resources to learn from. > > **Cons**: Initial setup for a new project can be difficult and take quite a lot of time. Time taken to prioritize report's significance is often quite significant. Report quality isn't consistent, can vary wildly. > > I submit programs to HackerOne to find bugs that seem to be otherwise undetectable. It's been very effective in this capacity and I've avoided any bugs being exploited in a fielded product. ----- ### "Theory Number One" — 5.0/5 > **Camencia** | *9 July 2025* | Broadcast Media | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I am trying to get into the Cyber Security field. Every since I used the demo, I have decided to use this platform for my clients because of the ease of data collection. You don't have to search all over the platform for information. It is basically handed to you in one pile. > > **Cons**: At this time I have not discovered anything dislikable. I have yet to cross this bridge, however, I am going to be in search of. > > I was impressed with the new features. I can only imagine how much harder it was to work with the older version. I was thinking it was new software until I did some research. ----- ### "hackerone review" — 4.0/5 > **Michal** | *16 July 2025* | Accounting Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The concept is really good, as it allows competition amongst independent hackers to do security audits of your application > > **Cons**: The results may vary as it depends on the participants that take part in auditing your applications. Sometimes there are more sometimes less ----- ### "Expensive and not fair to researchers, low ethics" — 4.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *8 September 2021* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **Pros**: They're in a leading position, which means the top researchers want to work with them > > **Cons**: 1) the only people you'll get to talk to as a client are sales people, with no knowledge of security or tech. 2) I don't like the way they collaborate with researchers: in their first level of the program, you pay a huge amount of money to the company, but it doesn't get distributed to the researchers at all. Their argument is that researchers go into this program to gain ranking points, until they have enough points to reach the next level and gain access to programs where they'll be paid for their reports. It's like working as an unpaid intern for years, just for the glory, until you maybe get access to a paid job. I think it's totally unfair to hackers who work really hard to find meaningful vulnerabilities. They have to do it as a graduation step, because HackerOne is in a leading position and will twist their arms ----- ### "Hackerone Bug Bounty Platform" — 3.0/5 > **Mohit** | *21 June 2020* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: - Easy to use and submit a report. - Quick validation for critical and severe vulnerabilities. - Public disclosure is offered by very less platforms so its one of the big pros. > > **Cons**: - My report was validated and bug was triaged and in a few days the bug was patched. But the report was assigned to a new member and he stated that it was triaged by a mistake. The injection was although minor but was valid so I think there should be some good validation process around it. > > Not that good. Nothing offered not even badges for duplicate valid bugs. Thus I go for private programs that directly work on the reports. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/165190/hackerone?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/165190/hackerone) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data