--- description: Get detailed information about TrialKit usability, features, price, benefits and disadvantages from verified user experiences. Read reviews and discover similar tools on Capterra Israel. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TrialKit Price, Reviews & Ratings - Capterra Israel 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Clinical Trial Management Software](/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) > [TrialKit](/software/149821/clinical-studio) # TrialKit Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.il/software/149821/clinical-studio Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/149821/clinical-studio?page=2) > Unified eClinical platform to design, manage, and analyze trials with embedded AI—accessible via web and native mobile apps. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 34 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses TrialKit? TrialKit is ideal for CROs and sponsors seeking a compliant, comprehensive, and mobile-friendly platform to collect and manage clinical data, specifically for virtual/remote trials. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 34 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support Software | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Crucial Data Solutions - **Location**: Reno, US - **Founded**: 2010 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing Details**: Please contact Crucial Data Solutions to learn more about subscription options for TrialKit. - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Chromebook (Desktop), Android (Mobile), iPhone (Mobile), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: Chinese, Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Norwegian, Polish, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Ukrainian - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, United States ## Features - 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance - Audit Trail - Compliance Management - Data Import/Export - Distributed Capture - Document Classification - Document Imaging - Document Management Software - EMR/EHR - Electronic Data Capture Software - Financial Management Software - Forms Management - HIPAA Compliant - Inventory Management Software - Patient Management Software - Patient Monitoring - Patient Recruiting - Remote Data Capture - Reporting/Analytics - Scheduling Software - Third-Party Integrations - Trial Design - Workflow Management Software ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - Knowledge Base Software - Phone Support ## Category - [Clinical Trial Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Clinical Trial Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [Electronic Data Capture Software](https://www.capterra.co.il/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Castor EDC](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 2. [ShareCRF](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/1031214/sharecrf) — 4.8/5 (44 reviews) 3. [Viedoc](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/160680/viedoc) — 4.4/5 (95 reviews) 4. [Jotform](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/158456/jotform-4-0) — 4.7/5 (2794 reviews) 5. [Greenlight Guru Clinical](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/152998/smart-trial) — 4.4/5 (72 reviews) ## Reviews ### "No SLA, Accountability: Rolling out Validated Features that are not FDA Compliant" — 1.0/5 > **Grace** | *21 July 2025* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Pros**: Really disappointing software and software support. Sometimes we wait more than a week for a response and when FDA trial participants are not able to save their responses we lose 12-14 in a week at a time and do not recoup those costs. > > **Cons**: No accountability, very buggy software, not accountable for mobile-views of their surveying tools, audio fails during sessions, heavy push for additional mobile app development and delay after delay in fixes. Very costly, not knowing what features are validated for trials, allowing us to believe that certain features like mobile-view are validated--however, this was not true and more than 50% trial participant failures in this mode requiring us early on to purchase additional development for a mobile app separately because the mobile view was not actually validated. This was not communicated from the get-go and the trial delays and costs are unbelievable. There are trial costs and damages in the millions in working with Trial Kit and Fuel. No accountability and dangerous practices that should raise issues with any accreditations. > > Shockingly poor, oversold, and once you're using, you cannot switch out during the trial. Misled by former reviews that were suspiciously high for a very buggy, unreliable product with poor service to boot. ----- ### "Medical Device Start-up Experience with TrialKit" — 5.0/5 > **Mindy** | *16 December 2024* | Medical Devices | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: The team at Crucial Data Solutions had great customer service. They were promptly and consistently available to provide direct support during our build and throughout the study. > > **Cons**: I used TrialKit before TrialKit AI became available. At the time, some of the reporting functionality was cumbersome, making it more difficult to capture key performance metrics for our trial. I look forward to trying the AI tools as we plan for our next study. > > Wonderful\! I would gladly recommend it to colleagues. ----- ### "Rapid Turnaround Time and Phenomenal Customer Service" — 5.0/5 > **Margaret** | *25 June 2021* | Pharmaceuticals | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It's not required that you hire a programmer to design and implement eCRFs with this system. The training and customer service team is so incredibly helpful. I was able to turn around an entire study's EDC setup within 3 weeks of getting contracts signed. > > **Cons**: Each time I've identified a pain point or a feature that I would like or wanted to work better, it was updated in the next release. I don't currently have any unmet needs. ----- ### "TrialKit - Leadership that is transforming the biotechnology industry" — 5.0/5 > **Stephen** | *5 February 2022* | Biotechnology | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Answered in previous section with regards to system performance > > **Cons**: The only improvement I would recommend is the add the capability to schedule jobs to automatically generate reports and send them to a sFTP. > > Wonderful\! I know that sounds short, but it really has been a system that I have grown to appreciate and enjoy working within. The tech support and staff at TrialKIt are also a primary reason for my choice to go with TrialKit. Working with TrialKit allows the versatility to have a solution for my clients where I can contour the system to meet their needs. ----- ### "Crucial Clinical Study Database review" — 4.0/5 > **Sarah** | *18 June 2020* | Medical Devices | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The process of working with the Crucial team was and continues to be seamless. It was easy to obtain/access the software. Our database developers used the software to create a database for a large, global clinical registry and the Crucial team has been very supportive of both the initial set-up as well as multiple updates to the database that have occurred along the way. We have been able to integrate the platform easily within our clinical processes and customer service has been exceptional. > > **Cons**: Future development opportunities exist around reporting and metric-tracking. Specifically, improving capabilities for clinical trial metrics and auto-generated reports. Much of the current reporting requires that a user first exports the data followed by analysis and report generation through additional tools such as excel. While this is technically functional, it would be fantastic to have more common reports available in the software that would allow you to view key information within your data at the click of your mouse. For example, additional standard/customizable reports that contain aggregate data, summary information from your data, some data sorting capabilities, and tracking of metrics commonly used within a clinical trial stetting (e.g., monitoring metrics such as query aging, etc.) would make it even easier and faster to oversee any given clinical study. > > Our business needed a cost-effective, easy-to-use solution that could support data capture for a complex, large-scale, global, medical device registry. Data collection would be significant in amount with varying types of information required. In addition, we anticipated that multiple database updates would be implemented in order to refine data collection and the system has demonstrated an ability to accommodate these needs. While the reporting and metric capabilities do provide some opportunities for future improvements within the software, we can still get to the information. Overall, our experience has been very positive and we would consider this platform for future studies without hesitation. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/149821/clinical-studio?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.il/software/149821/clinical-studio) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data